Royal expert reveals the reason as to why the Sussexes are disliked by Americans
The shifts in public opinion regarding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle reflect a complex narrative shaped by cultural differences, media portrayal, and the couple's own actions. While Harry's approval ratings have significantly dropped in the UK, largely due to his criticisms of the Royal Family and their traditions, American perceptions have historically been more favorable, possibly due to differing cultural attitudes toward monarchy and celebrity.
 |
A royal expert has claimed Harry and Meghan are disliked by Americans because 'they hate that they let the Queen down'. Pictured together on the balcony of Buckingham Palace in 2018
In the UK, loyalty to the monarchy and traditions plays a significant role in public opinion. Harry's outspoken criticisms, including in his memoir Spare and other media appearances, have been seen by many as betrayals.
 |
Meghan made a solo appearance at a glitzy event in Beverly Hills on December 4 to celebrate her friend Tyler Perry getting an award
In the U.S., individualism and the ability to "speak one's truth" are often celebrated, which initially worked in Harry and Meghan's favor. However, there seems to be a growing sense of fatigue among some Americans regarding their ongoing public disclosures.
 |
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, in 2018, before they abandoned Britain and the Royal Family to move to California
British tabloids have frequently criticized Harry and Meghan, amplifying negative sentiment. American media has been more mixed but has started to question the couple's relevance and consistency in messaging.
 |
The Duke of Sussex laughed off the rumours about his and Meghan's separation while onstage during The New York Times Dealbook Summit 2024, New York, on December 4
Younger generations and more progressive audiences tend to sympathize with Harry and Meghan, appreciating their advocacy for mental health, racial equality, and challenging traditional norms. Conservative voices, as highlighted by individuals like Eric Trump, often dismiss their actions, viewing them as self-serving or disrespectful to the monarchy.
 |
Harry was once one of the most popular members of The Firm but has had a spectacular fall from grace. Pictured with his family on July 10, 2018
Over time, the constant public airing of grievances may have contributed to a decline in public interest or sympathy. This aligns with the suggestion that many now simply don't think about Harry and Meghan, as they are increasingly seen as less relevant to ongoing royal and cultural narratives.
 |
Meghan's decision to wear a revealing red dress at a gala for the Children's Hospital Los Angeles in October drew criticism
Harry and Meghan could regain public favor by focusing on charitable work, stepping back from personal controversies, and re-establishing themselves as positive forces for change.
 |
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex dramatically moved across the pond after quitting as senior royals and leaving Britain in January 2020. Harry and Meghan are pictured with Charles and Camilla in 2018
Continued public disputes or perceived commercial exploitation of their royal status could deepen divides in opinion. As suggested by some insiders, the couple could fade from public consciousness if they fail to maintain their relevance through meaningful initiatives.
 |
Harry made many attacks in his memoir, including calling his mother-in-law, Queen Camilla, 'dangerous' and a 'villain' and alleging she had 'sacrificed him' to improve her reputation
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s apparent shift in public relations strategy suggests they are aiming to reshape their narrative and regain public interest. After years of highly personal revelations and controversy, a fresh approach could focus on their philanthropic efforts, professional ventures, and a more low-key public presence.
 |
In March 2021, the Sussexes appeared on Oprah following 'Megxit' and alleged that some members of the royal family questioned 'how dark' their child's skin might be when he's born
Their work through the Archewell Foundation, such as initiatives supporting mental health, military veterans, and children’s safety online, has been spotlighted recently. For example, Harry's ongoing dedication to the Invictus Games and Meghan’s advocacy for female empowerment are likely intended to highlight their altruistic side.
 |
At the end of 2022, Harry and Meghan's docuseries came out, where Prince Harry claimed they had to quit royal duties to 'protect' his wife and said there was a 'huge level of unconscious bias' in the Royal Family
Both Harry and Meghan have been making solo appearances. This allows each to cultivate their individual brand while reducing the potential for their joint presence to overshadow the causes they champion.
 |
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle now enjoy life at their $14.7million home in Santa Barbara, California
Meghan’s lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard, and her planned Netflix cooking and home show aim to position her as a relatable public figure with interests outside of royal matters.
Harry’s continued focus on charitable efforts in Africa through Sentebale shows his commitment to causes he has supported for years.
 |
Harry and Meghan's blink-and-you-miss-it appearance in Polo comes at the beginning of episode five, when Harry plays a charity polo match for his non-profit Sentebale
 |
Meghan planted a kiss on Harry after his team the Royal Salute Sentebale won the charity match featured in episode five of the docu-series |
The couple appears to be stepping back from direct criticism of the Royal Family in public statements. This might reflect a realization that constant conflict detracts from their broader goals. They have become more calculated in their media appearances, choosing events or platforms that align with their image as global philanthropists and advocates.
 |
The late Queen and Meghan on the balcony of Buckingham Palace for the 100th Anniversary of the Royal Air Force on July 10, 2018
After years of media saturation, many people are disengaged from the Sussexes' narrative. Reviving interest will require tangible, impactful actions.
 |
A recent German film titled 'Harry: The Lost Prince' includes expert commentary on the allegations the Duke of Sussex made against his family in his book Spare
Critics may view their efforts as performative, especially if they coincide with new commercial ventures or high-profile projects. A focus on delivering meaningful results rather than generating publicity is crucial to winning back public trust.
 |
The documentary extensively quoted British Royal reporters and experts, talking about the gulf between their supposedly noble work and their luxury lifestyle
The Sussexes' recent moves—both individually and as a couple—highlight their evolving strategy to maintain relevance while managing public scrutiny. Their decision to appear separately at events reflects differing priorities, which some interpret as a "professional separation" rather than personal discord. Here’s a breakdown of these developments:
Harry has concentrated on his long-standing charitable commitments, such as the Invictus Games and his African charity, Sentebale. His solo engagements emphasize his dedication to service and a more grounded public image.
Meghan appears to be aligning herself with commercial and entertainment ventures. The upcoming Netflix home and cooking show and her lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard, signal her interest in building an independent empire.
This dual-track strategy allows each to pursue their individual goals while broadening their appeal to different audiences.
Harry’s humorous dismissal of separation rumors highlights their awareness of the relentless media speculation. By addressing these rumors lightly, the couple seems to aim for a narrative of unity despite their distinct paths.
Meghan’s appearance at the LA gala in a revealing red gown sparked debate about her public image. Critics argue she risks overstepping into celebrity territory, diminishing her royal gravitas.
The lingering lack of progress with American Riviera Orchard has also attracted skepticism. Despite an ambitious launch, the brand’s inactivity suggests potential delays or strategic recalibration.
Nine months after its launch, American Riviera Orchard remains enigmatic, The minimal updates on its Instagram and website have left supporters frustrated. Its "royal-inspired" branding has raised eyebrows, fueling accusations of leveraging royal connections for profit.
Meghan may be intentionally keeping a low profile until a major product release or campaign is ready, aiming for a splashy re-entry to maximize impact.
What’s Next?
- For Harry: Continued focus on philanthropy may solidify his reputation as a compassionate leader, especially if he avoids further controversy.
- For Meghan: A successful launch of her lifestyle brand and Netflix show could redefine her as a businesswoman and media personality, provided the offerings resonate with audiences.
- For Both: Their ability to balance individual pursuits with a unified public image will be key to maintaining interest and silencing critics.
The struggles Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are facing in both public perception and Hollywood are reflective of missteps in their approach to media and branding. While they entered the entertainment and business world with great fanfare, their ventures have struggled to resonate with audiences or establish their credibility as power players in these industries.
Publicist Jane Owen's remarks highlight a growing sentiment in Hollywood that the Sussexes have failed to capitalize on their initial opportunities. By not delivering consistently high-quality or engaging content, they risk alienating potential collaborators.
The Netflix polo show has been poorly received, with critics panning it as dull and out of touch. Harry’s minimal involvement has only added to the disappointment, suggesting a lack of focus or investment in the project. Their declining star power in elite circles may stem from unfulfilled expectations and a perception that they overpromise but underdeliver.
Despite its potential, the brand’s launch has been poorly managed. Relying on sporadic social media teasers of jam and dog biscuits—products that feel disconnected from Meghan’s projected image of luxury and lifestyle sophistication—has left many underwhelmed.
Releasing a Netflix series and launching the lifestyle brand simultaneously could dilute attention and risk overshadowing both ventures. This lack of strategic planning underscores the challenges they face in executing their ambitious plans.
Criticism of their ventures and the perception that they leverage their royal titles without delivering substance have hurt their reputation with both the public and key industry stakeholders.
 |
Harry threw around many accusations against the royal family in Spare, along with alleging that he had a physical fight with his brother and heir to the throne, Prince William. Pictured: William, Charles and Harry in 2014
Projects like the polo documentary, which focus on elite lifestyles, can seem tone-deaf in a time of economic hardship, further alienating audiences.
To rebuild credibility and regain relevance, Harry and Meghan could consider the following:
- Refocus on Authenticity: Their strongest appeal lies in their personal story and advocacy work. Authentic, meaningful projects that align with these strengths are more likely to resonate.
- Streamline Ventures: Avoid launching multiple projects simultaneously and ensure each has a clear vision and strategy. American Riviera Orchard needs a cohesive identity, not a patchwork of unrelated products.
- Better Hollywood Collaborations: Partnering with experienced producers, writers, and publicists could help improve the quality of their media projects and rebuild trust in their ability to deliver.
- Reconnect with Audiences: Engaging directly with fans and critics, whether through interviews, social media, or appearances, could help rebuild trust and loyalty.
The German documentary "Harry: The Lost Prince" underscores a growing critique of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s post-royal life. The accusations of hypocrisy and exploitation of their royal status further reflect challenges in maintaining credibility as global advocates.
 |
The bombshell Germany documentary runs a fine-toothed comb through Harry and Meghan's work with their charity Archewell Foundation
Below is an analysis of the key points raised in the documentary and their implications for the Sussexes' public image:
 |
Princess Catherine and Prince William do an awkward looking walkabout with Prince Harry and Meghan at Windsor Castle following the death of the Queen on September 10, 2022
1. Accusations of Hypocrisy
- Contrasting Lifestyles:
- Meghan’s preference for high-end designer clothes is seen as conflicting with their advocacy for social justice and their visits to impoverished regions like Nigeria and Colombia.
Queen Elizabeth II and the Duchess of Sussex at the opening of the new Mersey Gateway Bridge, in Widnes, Cheshire, on June 14, 2018
- This perceived disconnect reinforces criticism that their actions do not align with their messaging, making it harder for audiences to empathize with their causes.
2.Criticism of Harry’s Memoir and Media Ventures
- Ben McBean's Remarks:
- As a fellow veteran, McBean’s criticisms carry weight, particularly given Harry’s military background. His comments about "whinging" and airing personal grievances publicly echo wider public sentiment that Harry's disclosures in Spare and Netflix projects have been excessive and unproductive.
- Family Drama in Public:
- Harry’s accounts of family disputes, such as the alleged altercation with Prince William, have been widely criticized as unnecessary and damaging to his image. Many view these revelations as a distraction from his philanthropic and humanitarian goals.
3. Alleged Exploitation of Royal Status
- Financial Motivation:
- The documentary’s claim that Harry and Meghan are leveraging their royal connections to sustain their lifestyle highlights ongoing criticism of their commercial endeavors. Critics argue that their projects often rely on their former royal roles, rather than independent achievements or contributions.
4. Opportunities for Redemption
- Rebuild Authenticity:
- The Sussexes should prioritize actions over words, focusing on tangible results from their philanthropic initiatives. Transparency in how they balance their lifestyle with their advocacy efforts could help mitigate criticism.
- Shift Focus Away from Royal Drama:
- Moving away from discussions of family conflict and focusing on impactful projects would help refocus public attention on their positive contributions.
- Reengage with Supporters:
- Actively engaging with their audience through meaningful dialogue and consistent updates on their projects could rebuild some of the goodwill they have lost.
The German documentary's critique of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle sheds light on deeper concerns regarding their integration into their chosen community, the effectiveness of their philanthropic work, and their broader appeal in both the U.S. and U.K. Below is an analysis of the key points raised, alongside strategies they could adopt to counteract these perceptions:
1. Criticism of Montecito Lifestyle
- Wealth and Exclusivity:
- The couple's life in Montecito, surrounded by multimillion-dollar homes and wealthy neighbors, starkly contrasts with their public persona as advocates for equality and social justice. This perceived contradiction fuels accusations of hypocrisy.
- Lack of Community Involvement:
- Comments from Montecito neighbor Richard Mineards highlight a lack of visible engagement with their local community. While Harry is noted as “jolly,” Meghan’s absence from public life in the area adds to a perception of aloofness.
2. Archewell's Limited Activity
- Minimal Involvement:
- Spending just one hour a week on Archewell-related work undermines the couple's claims of being dedicated activists. This revelation damages their credibility, especially when compared to other high-profile philanthropists who actively champion their causes.
- Potential Perception Issues:
- Critics could interpret the limited time spent on their foundation as a sign of insincerity or a lack of genuine commitment to their stated goals.
3. Critique of "Whinging"
- Backlash from Americans:
- Royal author Angela Levin's observation that Americans are growing weary of the couple's "moaning" reflects a significant challenge for Harry and Meghan in retaining U.S. support. Americans tend to value optimism, resilience, and a solutions-focused attitude, making repeated grievances about the Royal Family less palatable.
- The Queen's Legacy:
- Attacking the Royal Family, particularly in light of Queen Elizabeth II’s enduring popularity, continues to alienate segments of their potential audience.
4. Rare Successes
- Praise for Harry’s WellChild Appearance:
- Harry’s solo participation in meaningful events like the WellChild awards serves as a reminder of his potential to make positive contributions. These successes, however, are overshadowed by ongoing controversies and perceived missteps.
In contrast, Harry's journey to London for the WellChild awards for ill children in September was widely praised. Pictured speaking to Lewis Connett, aged 11
Recommendations for Reputation Recovery
- Embrace Local Community Engagement:
- Actively participate in Montecito events and causes, establishing themselves as integral and approachable members of the community. This would counteract accusations of aloofness and strengthen their local reputation.
- Reprioritize Archewell:
- Dedicate more time and energy to their foundation, ensuring tangible results that reflect their stated mission. Publicizing measurable successes would help rebuild trust.
- Reduce Public Complaints:
- Shift focus away from grievances about the Royal Family and instead emphasize their accomplishments and forward-looking projects.
- Leverage Harry's Strengths:
- Harry’s charisma and dedication to causes like veteran support and children’s health should be emphasized in future engagements. His ability to connect with people can help restore goodwill.
- Reinforce Authenticity:
- Transparency about their challenges and clear communication of their goals would resonate more than vague or inconsistent public relations efforts.
The unflattering portrayal of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in South Park and the controversy surrounding Harry’s receipt of the Pat Tillman Award highlight the ongoing challenges they face in maintaining their public image. These incidents have amplified criticisms of their actions and authenticity, particularly in the U.S., where their popularity has traditionally been higher than in the U.K.
 |
Harry and Meghan's unpopularity was made clear when they were mocked and humiliated in an episode of South Park in 2023
The South Park episode, The Worldwide Privacy Tour, mocked the couple for what many perceive as contradictory behavior—seeking privacy while engaging in high-profile media projects. Satirical critiques like this resonate because they reflect a broader skepticism about the couple’s motives.
Reports of Meghan being "upset and overwhelmed" by the episode suggest the couple may struggle to handle public criticism, reinforcing perceptions of fragility or thin-skinned responses to media scrutiny.
Controversy Over the Pat Tillman: The decision to honor Harry with an award typically reserved for unsung heroes sparked widespread criticism. A significant portion of the public viewed him as a controversial figure unworthy of the accolade, undermining the award’s intended purpose.
 |
Mary Tillman, the fallen NFL star-turned-veteran's mother, said she was 'shocked' her son's award would go to 'such a controversial and divisive figure' like Harry |
Pat Tillman’s mother calling Harry "divisive" added emotional weight to the backlash, highlighting the award’s mismatch with its recipient in the eyes of many.
 |
Prince Harry courted controversy when he accepted the Pat Tillman Award in July |
Poll Results: The poll by Redfield and Wilton showed a stark divide in public opinion, with only 21% supporting the decision. This underscores Harry’s waning appeal in the U.S.
 |
A beaming Meghan Markle places her hand on Harry's leg as the couple pose for the cameras at the glitzy award ceremony in Los Angeles that later became shrouded in controversy |
Comments
Post a Comment