Prince Harry didn't wear Coronation medal given to him by King Charles as he presented 'Soldier of the Year' award

Prince Harry's decision not to wear the Coronation medal during the award ceremony for Sergeant First Class Elizabeth Marks has indeed garnered attention from royal observers. The absence of this particular decoration, which commemorates King Charles' ascension to the throne, has raised eyebrows and led to speculation about Harry's intentions.

Prince Harry wore a series of medals to present a US combat medic with a Soldier of the Year Award via video message

While Harry sported a selection of medals, including those representing his grandmother Queen Elizabeth II's Jubilees, the absence of the Coronation medal has been noted as significant. Some royal experts have interpreted this omission as potentially signaling a snub to his father, King Charles, particularly given the ceremonial importance of the Coronation and its associated medal.

The medals appear to be the same ones he wore to his father King Charles III's coronation in May last year

The medals Harry chose to wear during the event align with those he wore on other occasions related to the Coronation, further highlighting the deliberate nature of his decision. This calculated move has sparked discussions about Harry's evolving relationship with the royal family and his desire to establish himself independently, particularly as he continues to build his life in the United States.

Harry's medals (left to right) comprised his Afghanistan service medal as well as Golden, Diamond and Platinum Jubilee medals for his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II

The context surrounding Prince Harry's absence of the Coronation medal provides additional insight into the significance of his decision. Despite not attending the festivities in military dress, it's believed that Harry was among the recipients of the Coronation medal, which was awarded to individuals who played active roles in the Coronation ceremonies, including members of the armed forces, emergency service personnel, and others in recognition of their public service.

King Charles III pictured on his Coronation day in May last year. Royal experts believe the omission of the Coronation medal may have been a snub

The Coronation medal features an effigy of King Charles and Queen Camilla on the front (left) and the royal cypher, CIIIR (Charles III Rex), on the rear

Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams's perspective suggests that Harry's choice not to wear the medal could be interpreted as a deliberate effort to distance himself from his previous life within the royal family, especially as he establishes himself in the United States. This deliberate act underscores Harry's desire to forge his own path and assert his independence from traditional royal expectations.

Four-time Invictus Games gold medalist and five-time Paralympic medalist Sergeant First Class Elizabeth Marks, 33, (pictured) suffered bilateral hip injuries while deployed in Iraq in 2010, after joining up aged just 17

The observations made by royal experts highlight the careful consideration given to Prince Harry's actions and their potential implications. By choosing not to wear the Coronation medal, Harry may indeed be signaling a deliberate distance from the royal family, as suggested. This decision, in the eyes of commentators, underscores the meticulous approach the Sussexes take to their public image and the awareness they possess regarding the scrutiny they face.

Harry also opted not to wear his Coronation medal as he gave a gag-filled monologue at the Stand Up for Heroes event for US veterans last November

The presence of other medals, such as the Operational Service medal and those commemorating Queen Elizabeth II's Jubilees, reinforces Harry's continued connection to his military background and his respect for his grandmother's reign. These choices reflect his personal journey and experiences, particularly his significant involvement in military service.

The audience at Stand Up For Heroes in New York last night to watch Prince Harry's address, which was packed with gags 

Ultimately, Prince Harry's decision not to wear the Coronation medal adds to the ongoing narrative surrounding his evolving relationship with the monarchy and his efforts to carve out a distinct identity for himself and his family, particularly as they establish roots outside of the traditional royal framework.

Prince Harry's presentation of the Soldier of the Year award to Sergeant First Class Elizabeth Marks showcased his ongoing commitment to honoring military service members and advocating for their well-being. Despite the event being pre-recorded and staged, Harry's heartfelt tribute to Marks highlighted her remarkable courage and resilience in the face of adversity.

SFC Marks competed for Team United States at the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games (pictured)

She also picked up meals at the Rio Paralympic Games in 2016 (pictured winning Gold in the Women's 100m breaststroke)

Marks' own message emphasized the critical need for better mental health support for military veterans, addressing the challenges they often face after completing their service. Her plea for improved care and recognition of the struggles veterans endure resonated deeply with Harry and the audience.

Harry's involvement in such events, whether in person or through pre-recorded messages, underscores his dedication to supporting veterans and raising awareness about their experiences. His decision not to wear the Coronation medal during this occasion reflects his ongoing transition away from traditional royal duties and his focus on causes he is passionate about, such as veteran support and mental health advocacy.

As Prince Harry officially considers the United States his primary residence, his continued involvement in charitable endeavors and initiatives like the Soldier of the Year award ceremony reaffirms his commitment to making a positive impact in his new home country and beyond.