Prince Harry is 'safe to stay in America if Biden wins': US ambassador to London laughs of suggestion Duke could be deported - after Trump threatened action if he is elected
US Ambassador Jane Hartley's dismissal of the suggestion that Prince Harry could be deported under the Biden administration indicates a stance of assurance regarding Harry's residency status in the United States while Joe Biden is in office. This response comes in the wake of comments from the Republican frontrunner, who suggested consequences for Harry if he's found to have lied about drug use on his visa application. Ambassador Hartley's statement reflects a confidence in the Biden administration's approach to immigration and suggests that Harry's residency in the US is secure under Biden's leadership.
Donald Trump said last week that 'action' could be taken against the Duke of Sussex if he is found to have lied about taking drugs on his US visa application
The Heritage Foundation's decision to sue the Department for Homeland Security (DHS) to disclose Prince Harry's visa application is based on their assertion that the information is of significant public interest. They argue that the contents of Harry's application could potentially reveal whether he lied about his past drug use or received special treatment.
On the other hand, the Biden administration is opposing the disclosure on the grounds of protecting visa applicants' right to privacy. They are arguing that individuals have a right to keep certain personal information confidential, even if they are public figures.
US Ambassador Jane Hartley laughed off the suggestion Harry could be deported, telling Sky News: 'It's not gonna happen in the Biden administration'
The Heritage Foundation's rebuttal suggests that Prince Harry compromised his right to privacy by openly discussing his personal life, including drug use, in his memoir. They argue that by making this information public, he has waived his right to privacy on these matters.
Donald Trump's remarks during his interview with Nigel Farage on GB News express skepticism about Prince Harry potentially receiving special treatment regarding his visa status if he is found to have lied on his application. Trump suggests that if Harry did indeed lie, appropriate action should be taken, though he does not specify what that action might entail. When asked if this could mean Harry not being allowed to stay in America, Trump responds ambiguously, indicating uncertainty about the potential outcomes.
Interviewed for GB News by Nigel Farage last Tuesday, Donald Trump said Harry should not get 'special privileges' if it turns out he lied
Furthermore, Trump uses the opportunity to criticize Prince Harry and Meghan, accusing them of causing distress to the Queen with their public criticisms of the Royal Family. This reflects Trump's broader sentiments regarding the Sussexes and their actions, portraying them negatively in the public eye.
Donald Trump's comments regarding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex paint a negative picture of their actions during Megxit, accusing them of being disrespectful towards Queen Elizabeth II. Trump claims to have developed a close relationship with the Queen during his state visit to the UK in 2019, describing her as "unbelievable."
Harry has said he is considering becoming a US citizen
Trump's criticism of Harry and Meghan suggests that their public statements and decisions surrounding their departure from royal duties were hurtful to the Queen, even if she did not express it openly. He suggests that their actions may have deeply affected her, particularly considering her age at the time.
These comments from Trump are framed as his latest attack on the Sussexes, indicating ongoing tension between the former president and the royal couple. Additionally, Trump's status as the presumptive Republican presidential candidate, along with his lead in polls over Joe Biden, suggests potential implications for how his statements are perceived and their impact on public opinion regarding the Sussexes.
This article highlights Prince Harry's acknowledgment of past drug use, including cocaine, marijuana, and ayahuasca. These revelations raise questions about how he may have answered questions regarding drug use on his US visa application. The Heritage Foundation claims that Harry may have ticked the 'no' box regarding drug use on his application, which could potentially conflict with his past admissions.
The US immigration authorities typically inquire about drug use on visa applications, and discrepancies between the answers provided and the applicant's actual history can lead to complications, including visa rejection or travel issues.
Prince Harry's contemplation of US citizenship, as mentioned in his February interview with Good Morning America, adds another layer of complexity to the situation. While obtaining US citizenship may not be a high priority for him at the moment, it's plausible that his past drug use and how it's documented on his visa application could become relevant if he pursues citizenship in the future.
Comments
Post a Comment