BBC royal correspondent Nicholas Witchell says Meghan should have been 'less impatient' with royal aides who 'bent over backwards' to support her

Nicholas Witchell's perspectives on Meghan's situation within the royal family and his dismissal of the race factor in Harry and Meghan's departure from the UK reflect a particular viewpoint that not everyone might share. His assertion that Meghan should have been "less impatient" with royal aides might suggest a belief that she didn't fully assimilate into the royal structure or perhaps expected too much too soon.

BBC royal correspondent Nicholas Witchell (pictured) has claimed Meghan should have been less impatient with the royal aides who 'bent over backwards' to support her

His proximity to the Princess Diana Panorama interview and subsequent displacement by Martin Bashir highlights the competitiveness and complexities of royal reporting. The scandal surrounding Bashir's methods to secure the interview likely adds weight to Witchell's own experiences within the competitive landscape of royal journalism.

Witchell's commentary, as a veteran BBC reporter, could reflect a more traditional understanding of royal dynamics and the expectations placed on those within the institution. His praise for the Sussexes' team suggests an appreciation for the efforts made by their aides, potentially implying that Meghan's departure might not solely be attributed to the Palace's treatment.

He also dismissed the claims made in the Sussexes' 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview, arguing race was not a 'significant' factor' in their decision to leave the UK

Nicholas Witchell's perspective underscores the complexity of the situation within the royal family, particularly concerning Harry and Meghan's departure. His suggestion that Meghan might have been perceived as impatient and inclined to see well-meaning people as adversarial sheds light on a potential dynamic that might have contributed to their decision to step back from royal duties.

His viewpoint on race not being a significant factor, but rather nationality and culture, suggests a belief that the challenges faced by the couple might have been more rooted in differences related to their backgrounds rather than solely race-related issues.

Witchell's commentary also indicates a shared sense of disappointment in both directions: the Palace's alleged failure to engage more effectively with Harry and Meghan before their exit and the couple's perceived struggle to fully integrate or adjust within the royal framework.

Mr Witchell also believes Buckingham Palace should have 'tried harder' with Harry before he and Meghan left the royal family

His observation about the Queen finding it challenging to understand Harry's pain reflects the difficulty in comprehending the motivations and emotions behind such a significant decision to leave royal life, especially when viewed from within the institution.

Nicholas Witchell has a nuanced perspective on the coverage of the royal family, acknowledging the public's interest in the more sensational aspects while also recognizing the importance of the royal couple's work on serious issues like homelessness, the environment, and mental health. His discomfort with the "soap opera" element of reporting indicates a desire for a more substantive focus in royal coverage.

The incidents where he became part of the news himself, particularly the protest during the Six O'Clock News and the uncomfortable exchange with King Charles, demonstrate the challenges faced by journalists in high-profile settings.

In 2005, Prince Charles - as he was then - famously insulted the BBC's royal correspondent, Nicholas Witchell

His interactions with King Charles and his sons highlight the unpredictable nature of live reporting, especially when engaging with members of the royal family.

Witchell's praise for Prince William and Princess Kate's approach to their roles within the royal family indicates his respect for their dedication to more substantial causes. It appears he values their focus on issues that have a genuine impact on society, contrasting it with what he perceives as the more sensationalized aspects of royal coverage.

Nicholas Witchell's career in reporting on the royal family has been marked by a mix of memorable moments, controversies, and the intricacies of covering high-profile figures.

His acknowledgment that King Charles had not liked him for many years but later reconciled and even wished him well for retirement demonstrates the evolving nature of relationships in journalism, especially when covering figures as prominent as members of the royal family.

The incident during the live broadcast of Prince Archie's birth, where Witchell momentarily lost his train of thought, might have been an unexpected lapse but highlights the pressure and scrutiny that comes with reporting on major royal events, especially involving the popular Sussexes.

His comments on the Prince Andrew scandal, criticizing the royal family's necessity to distance themselves due to connections with Jeffrey Epstein, reflect the challenges faced by the monarchy in handling sensitive and controversial matters.

As he nears retirement, his perceived upcoming freedom from the BBC's impartiality constraints might allow him more latitude in expressing personal opinions on matters, as seen in his critique of Gary Lineker's tweets about Tory immigration policy.

Witchell's extensive tenure with the BBC and his involvement in reporting significant events, such as the coverage of Queen Elizabeth II's death, have solidified his position as a central figure in royal reporting. His views on Huw Edwards' suspension and the impact on the BBC hint at the complexities within the organization and the impact of such incidents on the media landscape.

Nicholas Witchell's career trajectory within the BBC spans various significant historical events and demonstrates his versatility in reporting across diverse subjects, from conflicts like the Falklands and covering major political campaigns to becoming a prominent royal correspondent.

In 1988 the Six O'Clock News studio was invaded by a group of lesbian protesters while Witchell and Sue Lawley were presenting

His pivotal role in reporting Princess Diana's death and providing live commentary during her funeral underscores his involvement in one of the most significant moments in recent royal history. Additionally, his interactions with Princess Diana, including the lunch invitation regarding a potential Panorama interview, highlight his proximity to significant royal events and the competitive landscape of securing high-profile interviews.

Mr Witchell even revealed how close he was to interviewing Princess Diana on Panorama until he was stood down in place of Martin Bashir, leading to an explosive BBC scandal over how the disgraced journalist secured the chat

The fallout from Martin Bashir's controversial Panorama interview with Diana, particularly the deceitful means used to obtain the interview, sheds light on the competitive nature of royal reporting and the ethical challenges within the industry.

Witchell's journey through different BBC programs and roles, from founding the Six O'Clock News to becoming a main presenter on Breakfast News and later transitioning to frontline reporting for Panorama and royal and diplomatic correspondence, demonstrates his adaptability and longevity within the BBC.

His career path showcases a deep involvement in reporting major global events, political campaigns, and royal affairs, solidifying his status as a seasoned journalist with a breadth of experience across various domains of reporting.