Omid Scobie takes aim at 'cold' Princess Catherine in first bombshells from new book as it's released in Australia: He claims Princess 'ignored Meghan's cries for help and 'jokingly shivered' at the mention of her sister-in-law's name
Omid Scobie's book is stirring up quite a bit of controversy with its portrayal of the Princess of Wales and the Royal Family dynamics. Scobie, known for his support of Harry and Meghan, might have a biased view in his portrayal of the royal family members. He has launched an astonishing and cruel attack on Princess Kate, branding her 'cold' and lambasting her for 'advocating for mental health causes while ignoring Meghan's cries for help'.
 |
Omid Scobie has launched an astonishing and cruel attack on the Princess of Wales , branding her 'cold' and lambasting her for 'advocating for mental health causes while ignoring Meghan's cries for help'
Kate's role within the monarchy and her approach to her duties might be perceived differently by various observers. Some might see her dedication and approach as commendable, while others might interpret it differently.
 |
Harry and Meghan's 'cheerleader-in-chief' Omid Scobie took aim at The Princess of Wales in his new book Endgame, which has been published in Australia. Kate is pictured at a recent event
Scobie claims the Princess Kate has never had interest in being friends with her sister-in-law and branded her a 'Stepford-like royal wife'.
In a scathing chapter dedicated to the future Queen, Scobie says the royal earned the nickname 'Katie Keen' and claimed the late Queen liked her because she was 'coachable'.
 |
Scobie claims the late Queen liked Kate because she's 'coachable' (pictured together in 2012)
Kate's increase in engagements over the years reflects her growing responsibilities and commitment to her role as a senior member of the Royal Family.
 |
Queen Elizabeth II and Catherine attend the annual Remembrance Sunday service at The Cenotaph on November 10, 2019
Omid Scobie suggests that the princess maintains a low profile and has not publicly challenged the system or demonstrated oversized aspirations. According to Scobie, she is comfortable in her role and fulfills her duties with a requisite smile and elegance.
The claim that the institution ignored Meghan when she was in pain is a serious one, suggesting a lack of support for her during challenging times. This assertion, paired with William allegedly claiming that his mother was too paranoid to speak the truth, paints a picture of an institution that may not provide adequate support to women not born into the royal family.
Scobie commented about Kate's workload being lower than other senior members of The Firm - which he says makes her 'technically a part time working royal'.
Kate started carrying out official royal engagements in 2011, the year she got married to Prince William. She started off with 34 engagements after the wedding in April, but in her second year she increased to 111 more than her husband who did 88 that year.
Scobie's book contains a lot of opinions and interpretations regarding the relationships and dynamics within the Royal Family, especially concerning the interactions between Meghan and Kate.
 |
| Scobie added that Kate misses her friendship with Prince Harry (pictured together in 2016 |
His portrayal suggests that Meghan was seen as a shining figure in her brief time as a working royal, with the focus on her work and role in the institution rather than just her fashion choices. This viewpoint contrasts with what he perceives as Kate's less assertive nature in terms of leadership and outgoing demeanor.
Scobie's claim about Kate's purported lack of interest in forming a bond with Meghan, depicting her as cold and not a fan of Meghan, provides a specific perspective on their relationship.
 |
| Scobie claims sources told him Kate was 'cold'' and 'wasn't a fan' of Meghan (the pair are pictured at Wimbledon in 2019) |
Photos of the sisters-in-law together could indeed present a different narrative than the one described in the book.
The portrayal of Meghan feeling isolated and hoping for support from Kate paints a poignant picture of the challenges she faced within the Royal Family.
Scobie's narrative paints a challenging and strained relationship between Kate and Meghan, suggesting a lack of support from Kate during Meghan's struggles and indicating a significant rift between the two. His portrayal implies that Kate remained silent during times when Meghan faced public scrutiny, leading to a breakdown in communication and connection between the sisters-in-law.
 |
| Scobie said that Kate and Meghan 'could have helped the warring Windsor brothers' if they'd made friends |
The idea of a "Kate 2.0" emerging after Megxit, portraying her as more approachable and engaging in initiatives like the Happy Baby, Happy Mum podcast, suggests a shift in her public image or perhaps an evolution in her approach to her role within the Royal Family.
Robert Jobson's comments highlight the controversy surrounding Omid Scobie's portrayal of Princess Catherine in his book. Jobson's view that Scobie's depiction of Kate constitutes an unwarranted attack on the Princess of Wales reflects the strong reactions that Scobie's book has provoked.
Jobson acknowledges Scobie's ability to craft attention-grabbing narratives and sell books, citing Scobie's previous work, "Finding Freedom," which also generated significant attention for its portrayal of the royal family dynamics. However, Jobson's criticism suggests that Scobie's latest depiction of Kate crosses a line, being unfair and unwarranted.
The portrayal of Kate in Scobie's book has deeply upset some individuals who view her as a dedicated member of the Royal Family, committed to her duties and family. The descriptions in the book, such as referring to her as a "grinning puppet," have been seen as disrespectful and unwarranted.
The sentiments expressed here emphasize Kate's positive qualities and contributions, highlighting her devotion to her role within the monarchy and her support for her husband and family. These opinions underscore a sense of disappointment and confusion about why Scobie would present such a negative portrayal of Kate, raising questions about his motives and intentions.
Additionally, the comments suggest a personal connection between Harry and Kate, with the assertion that Harry wouldn't agree with this portrayal due to their perceived friendship and the respect they have for each other.
The criticisms from royal expert Richard Fitzwilliam offer a perspective on Omid Scobie's approach to sensationalism in his portrayal of the monarchy and particularly Princess Catherine. Fitzwilliam suggests that Scobie's aim for sensationalism, perhaps to generate attention or headlines, led to his critical depiction of Kate and her workload.
Fitzwilliam's commentary sheds light on Scobie's past association as an unofficial spokesperson for the Sussexes and his perspective on the monarchy facing a crisis. This viewpoint might influence Scobie's portrayal of the royal family in his writings.
Fitzwilliam also points out what he sees as a lack of understanding from Scobie regarding the strategic choices made by the Waleses family in selecting specific patronages and focusing on early childhood.
Scobie's depiction of Catherine, in contrast to Meghan, and the late Princess Diana highlights different approaches and personalities within the Royal Family.
Scobie's portrayal suggests that Catherine, seen as "coachable," demonstrates a willingness, along with Prince William, to commit to their roles as future monarchs, drawing inspiration from Queen Elizabeth II's iconic status. The implication of the term "coachable" hints at a dedication to fulfilling royal duties and obligations, with an inclination toward learning and adapting.
Comparatively, Scobie seems to regard Meghan as embodying qualities akin to those attributed to Princess Diana, particularly in her outreach to those in need. However, there's a suggestion that Meghan's actions might not match the narrative of her aspirations, pointing to a lack of tangible contributions beyond discussing them or criticizing the royal family.
The comments about Kate's workload and lifestyle may be seen as critical, implying a reluctance to significantly increase her royal duties for an extended period. Additionally, Scobie's mention of private secretaries departing due to the role being "uninspiring and frustrating" could suggest challenges within the team dynamics surrounding Kate's work.
Scobie's references to the late Queen's work patterns and Kate's approach to her duties suggest a balancing act between family priorities and royal obligations. The comparison to the late Queen, known for her extensive engagements, likely aims to highlight differing workloads and approaches across generations within the Royal Family.
The characterization of Kate as "laser-focused" on her family's duties first before her obligations to the Crown emphasizes her dedication to maintaining a balance between her role as a royal and her role as a mother and wife. This echoes previous descriptions of her prioritizing family life while fulfilling her royal responsibilities.
The mention of Kate occasionally stumbling in public speaking and her reluctance or discomfort in making her praised appearances, like the Blue Peter performance, suggests that despite external acclaim, she might face challenges or reservations in certain public situations.
 |
| Scobie added that Kate also 'often stumbles on her words' when speaking publicly and that she 'didn't want to make' her widely praised Blue Peter performance in June 2019 (pictured) |
Omid Scobie's book touches on various aspects of the Royal Family, including discussions around Kate's work patterns and Prince William's perceptions of his father, King Charles, particularly regarding the handling of Prince Andrew's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein.
 |
Before Prince Andrew was asked to step down from royal duties, the author says King Charles and Prince William (pictured in September 2022) grappled with the best course of action
The portrayal of Kate as "naturally timid" and someone who had not been pushed out of her comfort zone until a particular appearance sheds light on her perceived approach to royal duties. Scobie's description suggests a deliberate strategy by palace gatekeepers to navigate Kate's role, ensuring she meets her royal obligations while allowing her the space to prioritize her family life.
The claim that Prince William circumvented Kate's lower workload by focusing on his role in producing an heir and spares may reflect a strategic approach within the royal family dynamic.
Regarding Prince William's perceptions of King Charles' leadership and the handling of Prince Andrew's situation, Scobie's book appears to delve into the internal struggles and decision-making processes within the Royal Family. The book's narrative suggests differing viewpoints and tensions among family members regarding certain decisions and responsibilities within the monarchy.
 |
A source close to King Charles told Omid Scobie: 'You'd find it hard to believe but [Charles lay] awake many nights worrying about Andrew'
Omid Scobie's book provides a narrative that suggests Prince William's concerns about Prince Andrew's situation and his perceived lack of confidence in King Charles' leadership led him to take proactive steps to address the issue within the Royal Family.
 |
Scobie claims Prince William felt the Queen would be 'soft' on Prince Andrew unless he voiced his concerns directly to her
The claim that Prince William felt the need to voice his concerns directly to the Queen, fearing that she might be "soft" on Prince Andrew, reflects a dynamic where family members navigate their roles and responsibilities within the monarchy. The book suggests that Prince William initiated a plan to address the issue of Prince Andrew, as the late Queen and Prince Charles were reportedly not ready to take action.
The narrative describes a meeting between Prince William, the Queen, and her private secretary, with Prince William allegedly spending over an hour discussing the "Andrew problem." Following this discussion, the Queen reportedly contacted Prince Charles to convey the decision to strip Prince Andrew of his titles and duties.
The portrayal of this moment as "genuinely sad" for the Queen and a "gut punch" for the family after Prince Philip's death suggests the emotional weight and complexities involved in such decisions within the Royal Family.
The book's portrayal suggests various perspectives within the Royal Family regarding leadership styles and perceptions of key members, especially King Charles and Prince William.
The claim that Prince Andrew resigned from public duties in 2020 before being stripped of his military titles and patronages by the Queen in 2022 aligns with the public timeline of events surrounding Prince Andrew's withdrawal from royal duties due to his association with Jeffrey Epstein.
Regarding leadership styles, Scobie's book depicts Prince William admiring the Queen's political neutrality and aspiring to mirror her reign more than his father, Charles. This portrayal suggests divergent views and aspirations within the Royal Family regarding the type of monarchy they wish to uphold.
Furthermore, the book presents insights into the views of other royal figures, such as Princess Michael of Kent, who allegedly expressed critical opinions about Meghan Markle. The claim suggests that Princess Michael voiced opinions about Meghan making matters about race, particularly following the Oprah Winfrey interview, revealing differing opinions within the extended royal circle.
The allegations regarding comments made about Archie's skin color have been a highly sensitive and contentious issue since Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's interview with Oprah Winfrey. Omid Scobie's recent claims, suggesting that letters exchanged between King Charles III and Meghan reveal the names of two individuals who allegedly made comments about Archie's skin tone, have brought this issue back into the spotlight.
However, Scobie has mentioned that he cannot disclose the identities of these individuals due to legal concerns. He indicates that Charles was concerned and expressed his dismay over how Meghan felt after the interview, aiming to initiate a conversation as a representative for the family.
This situation threatens to reignite the controversy surrounding allegations of racism within the Royal Family. The incident involving Princess Michael of Kent wearing a controversial 'blackamoor' brooch to the Queen's Christmas lunch in 2017, attended by Meghan for the first time, had also sparked public outcry, with some commentators deeming the piece as racially insensitive.
 |
Omid Scobie has claimed Princess Michael of Kent said the Duchess of Sussex (pictured at Variety's Power of Women event at Mother Wolf in Los Angeles, California, on November 16, 2023) has 'made it all about race because that's all everyone does these days.'
Princess Michael publicly apologized at the time, acknowledging the offense caused by her choice of accessory, and the palace issued a statement expressing her regret for any distress caused.
The incident involving Princess Michael of Kent wearing a 'blackamoor' brooch to the Queen's Christmas lunch, where Meghan was also present, sparked controversy due to the historical connotations of such jewelry, often seen as racially insensitive. 'Blackamoor' figurines or jewelry depict figures with black skin, typically from the 18th century, and are valued as collectibles. The presence of this accessory at the event raised concerns and led to public discussions about its appropriateness, especially considering Meghan's attendance.
 |
| Meanwhile, Princess Michael of Kent came under fire when she wore a controversial 'blackamoor' brooch to the Queen's Christmas lunch in 2017, which was the first attended by Meghan. Some commentators claimed the piece was 'racist' |
 |
Princess Michael of Kent and Prince Michael of Kent attend the wedding of Lady Gabriella Windsor and Thomas Kingston at St George's Chapel on May 18, 2019 in Windsor
Regarding Prince Edward and Sophie, the Countess of Wessex's comments following Harry and Meghan's Oprah interview, their lighthearted remarks of not being familiar with Oprah or the interview itself were perceived by Omid Scobie as misjudged. He criticized the couple, particularly Sophie, suggesting that their comments about a prominent black woman in entertainment, and one of the world's most successful, could be interpreted as being out of touch or even casually bigoted.
 |
| Omid Scobie has called Prince Edward and his wife Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh's 'Oprah gaffe' a royal screw up |
Scobie's perspective frames these incidents as part of a series of missteps or errors within the Royal Family, contributing to public perceptions and discussions about racial sensitivity and awareness within the institution. These instances add to the ongoing conversation about racial sensitivity and awareness in the Royal Family, especially in the context of Meghan and Harry's experiences and the broader discussions on race and representation.
Omid Scobie's book paints a complex picture of dynamics within the Royal Family, especially in regard to interactions and perceptions involving Sophie and Edward, the Countess and Earl of Wessex. His claims suggest various instances where they might have been perceived as indifferent or lacking in acknowledgment, both within royal circles and during public engagements.
Regarding their interactions with Meghan Markle, Scobie suggests that Sophie and Edward, alongside Queen Camilla and Princess Kate, ignored Meghan outside Westminster Abbey at the late Queen's state funeral, allegedly contributing to a sense of exclusion or disregard.
Scobie also presents accounts suggesting that the Wessexes' overseas trips and engagements haven't received substantial coverage or recognition in Western press. His claims about their interactions during a visit to Antigua, especially Edward's response to discussions about Britain's colonial history, imply an uncomfortable or unprepared response in a sensitive context.
Moreover, Scobie's book contains assertions about the late Queen Elizabeth's views toward the transition of power within the monarchy. According to his sources, the Queen hired Andrew Parker, formerly the head of MI5, as the new Lord Chamberlain in 2021, which some interpreted as indicative of her having "a slight lack of faith" in Charles' ability to lead The Firm smoothly.
The claims in Omid Scobie's book regarding the private moments with Queen Elizabeth and the events surrounding her death provide insight into the final days of the monarch's life. The description of family members being allowed a private moment with the Queen after her passing adds a personal touch to the narrative.
 |
The late Queen insisted 'it's my job' as she saw out prime minister Boris Johnson and saw in Liz Truss at Balmoral two days before she died, a new book claims
The account of the Queen insisting on carrying out her duty despite her declining health, including overseeing the change of the UK prime minister, reflects her sense of commitment and responsibility. The details about her maintaining a routine, despite being in pain, and ensuring her red box of government papers was up to date every day provide a glimpse into the Queen's work ethic and dedication to her role.
Regarding the New York Times review, it appears to offer a critical perspective on Scobie's writing style and the content of the book, comparing a chapter to a press release and suggesting that it doesn't provide much new information.
The reviews of Omid Scobie's book "Endgame" offer different perspectives on its content and portrayal of the royal family.
 |
The New York Times' pithy review says we've heard most of it before
 |
| The Independent has given Endgame three stars in their review. They claim the book paints William as the 'villain' |
Eva Wolchover of the New York Times criticizes the book's portrayal of Harry and Meghan, likening a chapter to a robotic press release and questioning its ability to humanize them. She also finds Scobie's predictions about the Royal Family's fate hyperbolic.
Anna Pasternak, reviewing for The Independent, notes Scobie's sympathetic portrayal of the Sussexes while refraining from demonizing other royals. She highlights Scobie's focus on William as a negative figure and his critique of Kate Middleton's elocution lessons and turnover of private secretaries.
Scobie's claims about letters exchanged between King Charles III and Meghan regarding comments on Archie's skin color have the potential to reignite discussions about racism within the Royal Family, stemming from Meghan's revelations in her interview with Oprah Winfrey.
 |
| King Charles III attends St Mary Magdalene Church in Sandringham, Norfolk, |
Omid Scobie's book "Endgame" contains numerous claims and insights into the dynamics within the Royal Family. Scobie's assertions regarding Prince William allegedly leaking stories about Prince Harry, and the reported back-and-forth between King Charles and Meghan Markle over the comments about Archie's skin color, are among the notable points.
 |
| William, Harry, Meghan and Charles speak together at Westminster Abbey in March 2019 |
The book suggests a rift between Prince William and Prince Harry due to alleged leaks of private information by William, causing damage to their relationship. However, there are also indications of efforts to mend relationships, with reports of Harry attempting to reach out to William and potentially improving relations with Charles.
 |
| Meghan, Harry, William and Kate on the balcony of Buckingham Palace in July 2018 |
Scobie acknowledges that Meghan had contacted him during what he describes as being caught up in the family drama. Additionally, he emphasizes that despite the claims made in his book, he does not consider himself firmly aligned with "Team Sussex."
The exchanges between King Charles and Meghan, as per Scobie's claims, represent attempts at addressing the fallout from the allegations about Archie's skin color, describing the communication as respectful but serious, indicating an attempt to understand each other's perspectives despite potential differences.
 |
The King and Meghan Markle (pictured with Prince Harry and their son Prince Archie in September 2019) have a 'pleasant but distant relationship' after a 'respectful back and forth' via letter over two Royal Family members who made comments about Archie's skin colour, Omid Scobie has claimed
Omid Scobie's book "Endgame" provides insights into ongoing tensions within the Royal Family. The book suggests that while there have been exchanges between King Charles and Meghan Markle following the allegations about Archie's skin color, there remains a certain level of distance and unresolved issues between the families.
Scobie claims that there were letters exchanged between Charles and Meghan discussing the comments made about Archie's skin color, indicating that Charles was horrified by Meghan's feelings and sought to address the matter, possibly contributing to some level of ongoing communication between them.
Moreover, the book reportedly indicates that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are still hurt by the delay in the updating of their children's titles to 'prince' and 'princess', which should have happened automatically according to royal convention when King Charles ascended the throne. This delay seems to have left a lasting impact on the Sussexes, despite their contentment with their current life in California.
 |
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are 'still hurt' by the delay in giving Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet their new titles after King Charles ascended the throne, Omid Scobie's book claims
According to Scobie, there was reportedly a delay of about six months before their titles were officially updated, despite expectations that it would happen automatically. King Charles initially avoided the subject, but eventually assured Prince Harry that he would 'make it official' in early 2023. The changes were then casually mentioned to Prince Harry by the King's press secretary the following month before finally being updated on the palace website.
The delay apparently left Harry and Meghan feeling their children were being treated differently compared to Prince William and Kate's children, which they found uncomfortable. This seems to have contributed to ongoing tensions between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.
The book also touches on relationships within the family, suggesting that Queen Camilla reportedly has 'no relationship' with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. While she sympathizes with what Meghan went through, she allegedly lacks respect for how they handled themselves. Conversely, Camilla and King Charles are said to enjoy cordial lunches with Prince William and Princess Kate.
 |
Queen Camilla has 'great sympathy' for Meghan and Harry, according to Endgame, but not for the way she handled the situation with the royals
Omid Scobie's book 'End Game' suggests that Prince William has only read passages of his brother Prince Harry's memoir, 'Spare'. According to a source cited in the book, William has not read the entire book but has glanced through certain sections. The source also implies that William recognizes that Harry's experiences as the spare to the heir are different from what William's own children might face in the future.
 |
Omid Scobie delves into Prince William and Prince Harry's relationship in the wake of the Duke of Sussex 's memoir - which hit shelves in January
Additionally, Scobie's book claims that Prince Harry attempted to set up a conversation with Prince William through a mutual friend in the months following the publication of the memoir. However, according to the book, Prince William allegedly ignored these attempts to initiate a conversation with him.
 |
Pictured: the cover art for Prince Harry's memoir Spare, which hit shelves in January and set shockwaves through the Royal Family
The book by Omid Scobie highlights that Prince Harry made efforts to reach out to his brother, Prince William, in February and March while he was in London, not long after his memoir was published. According to Scobie's claims, despite Harry's attempts through a mutual friend, there was no response or acknowledgment from Prince William. Reportedly, Harry decided to focus on the future rather than dwell on the past after his attempts to initiate a conversation went unanswered.
In a separate instance while promoting his memoir, Prince Harry expressed concerns about the children of the Prince and Princess of Wales, indicating that even though he and William had discussed this matter briefly, William made it clear that his children were not Harry's responsibility. Harry shared his unease about the possibility that one of William's children might end up feeling like the "spare," similar to Harry's own experiences, which troubled him.
Comments
Post a Comment