Meghan Markle faces $75,000 trial after half-sister Samantha Markle claimed she was defamed during Oprah interview in order to 'cover up' the Duchess' 'false rags-to-riches' narrative

There's quite a storm brewing in the royal world with Scobie's book. The portrayal of Princess Catherine as "cold" and the accusations against her regarding Meghan's cries for help have sparked strong reactions, particularly from royal experts who find these claims unjust and without basis.

Meghan Markle pictured at the Variety 2023 Power of Women event in California on November 16

Meghan Markle poses on red carpet at Variety's 'Power of Women' gala

Loaded: 0%

Progress: 0%

0:00

Previous

Play

Skip

Mute

Current Time0:00

/

Duration Time0:43

Fullscreen

Need Text

The suggestion that Scobie might be aiming for attention by targeting Kate in such a manner raises questions about the motives behind these assertions.

Omid Scobie launched an astonishing and cruel attack on the Princess of Wales, lambasting her for 'advocating for mental health causes while ignoring Meghan's cries for help', while also branding her a 'part-time working royal' over the number of engagements she carries out compared to other members of the family.

Royal experts have said Scobie's attacks on the princess are 'unfair' and 'unwarranted' - and accused him of throwing 'a few blows' at her so that he could 'get headlines'.

The backlash against Omid Scobie continues, with royal experts criticizing him for what they perceive as a "nasty" approach in his book and suggesting that he may be trying to align himself with Harry and Meghan. This critique implies that there may be underlying motives in his portrayal of Princess Catherine.

On another note, Samantha Markle's defamation lawsuit against Meghan Markle is progressing, with a trial date set for November 4, 2024. Samantha is seeking $75,000 in damages, alleging that Meghan's comments during the Oprah interview led to harm to her reputation and affected her emotionally and professionally. The trial is expected to last up to five days, shedding light on the legal challenges arising from public statements and interviews within the royal family.

Samantha Markle is seeking damages in excess of $75,000

Meghan and Harry's Oprah Winfrey interview in March 2021. She claimed she grew up an 'only child' 

Samantha Markle's defamation lawsuit against Meghan Markle has taken a legal journey with some interesting developments. Initially, a judge in Florida threw out the suit in March, stating that Meghan's claims would be impossible to disprove. However, following amendments to the lawsuit, it seems that the same judge has found merit in Samantha's claims, leading to the scheduling of a trial date in November 2024.

The lawsuit revolves around Meghan's comments during the Oprah interview, where she made references to growing up as an only child. Samantha alleges that these comments were defamatory, as she insists she had a normal sibling relationship with her younger half-sister. The judge's decision to set a trial date suggests that there is now a legal basis to examine the allegations and evidence presented by both parties.

Samantha Markle claims she and Meghan were close when Meghan was a child

Samantha Markle's perspective, as shared through her attorney and in her lawsuit, sheds light on her allegations against Meghan Markle and the impact she claims Meghan's comments had on her life. Samantha alleges that Meghan's remarks during the Oprah interview led to humiliation, hatred, and negatively affected her book sales.

Her statements also suggest that she faced online harassment, including receiving death threats and the suspension of her Twitter account following the airing of certain shows featuring Harry and Meghan. These experiences highlight the potential consequences that public statements and media attention can have on individuals, especially those entangled in high-profile disputes.

Samantha's portrayal of her relationship with Meghan emphasizes their closeness during childhood and asserts that Meghan's success in acting led to a strained relationship. She contends that Meghan became hostile towards her and their family after meeting Prince Harry, resulting in their estrangement.

Meghan's legal team has maintained that her comments reflected her personal experiences, suggesting a divergence in the perspectives of the two sisters regarding their relationship dynamics.

The upcoming trial, expected to last longer than five days according to Samantha's attorney, will likely provide a platform for both parties to present their evidence and arguments. This legal process may further elucidate the intricacies of their relationship and the impact of Meghan's statements on Samantha's life and reputation.

Samantha Markle's initial lawsuit contained broader claims, alleging that Meghan intentionally defamed her by providing false information to the authors of "Finding Freedom." This included specific details, such as the claim that Samantha had dropped out of high school. However, these details seem to have been removed from the amended complaint, which now centers solely on Meghan's remarks during the Oprah interview.

The revised lawsuit appears to narrow its focus, specifically targeting the comments made by Meghan during the Oprah interview regarding their sibling relationship and Samantha's portrayal as an only child. This shift in the lawsuit's scope indicates a more concentrated effort to address the alleged defamation within the context of the Oprah interview, setting aside the broader claims related to Meghan's involvement in providing information for the book "Finding Freedom."

This adjustment might suggest a strategic decision to strengthen the case by concentrating on specific remarks made by Meghan, possibly to streamline the legal argument and evidence presented in court.